• HOME
  • REVISTA GEOPOLITICA
    • BOARD
      • DIPLOMATS
      • NATIONAL BOARD
      • INTERNATIONAL
    • 2023
      • NR. 2 (99)/2023 PRESIUNI GEOPOLITICE (II)
      • NR. 1 (98)/2023 PRESIUNI GEOPOLITICE (I)
    • 2022
      • nr. 96-97/2022
      • MAREA NEAGRĂ ÎN VORTEXUL GEOPOLITIC (II)
      • MAREA NEAGRĂ ÎN VORTEXUL GEOPOLITIC (I)
      • nr. 92-93/2022
    • 2021
      • nr. 91/2021
      • nr. 89-90/2021
      • nr. 87-88/2021
      • nr. 86/2021
    • 2020
      • nr. 85/2020
      • nr. 84/2020
      • nr. 83/2020
      • nr. 82/2020
    • 2019
      • nr. 81/2019
      • nr. 80/2019
      • nr. 78-79/2019
      • nr. 77/2019
    • 2018
      • nr. 76/2018
      • nr. 75/2018
      • nr. 74/2018
      • nr. 73/2018
    • 2017
      • nr. 72/2017
      • nr. 71/2017
      • nr. 70/2017
      • nr. 68-69/2017
    • 2016
      • nr. 67/2016
      • nr. 66/2016
      • nr. 64-65/2016
      • nr. 63/2016
    • 2015
      • nr. 62/2015
      • nr. 61/2015
      • nr. 60/2015
      • nr.59/2015 EN
      • nr.59/2015 RO
    • 2014
      • nr. 58/2014
      • nr. 57/2014
      • nr. 56/2014
      • nr. 54-55/2014
    • 2013
      • nr. 53/2013
      • nr. 52/2013
      • nr. 51/2013
      • nr. 49-50/2013
    • 2012
      • nr. 48/2012
      • nr. 47/2012
      • nr. 46/2012
      • nr. 44-45/2012
    • 2011
      • nr. 43/2011
      • nr. 41-42/2011
      • NR. 40/2011
      • nr. 39/2011
    • 2010
      • nr. 38/2010
      • nr. 36-37/2010
      • nr. 35/2010
      • nr. 33-34/2010
    • 2009
      • nr. 32/2009
      • nr. 31/2009
      • nr. 30/2009
      • nr. 29/2009
    • 2008
      • nr. 26/2008
      • nr. 25/2008
      • nr. 28/2008
      • nr. 27/2008
    • 2007
      • nr. 24/2007
      • nr. 23/2007
      • nr. 22/2007
      • nr. 21/2007
    • 2006
      • nr. 20/2006
      • nr. 19/2006
      • nr. 18/2006
      • nr. 16-17/2006
    • 2005
      • nr. 14-15/2005
      • nr. 13/2005
      • nr. 12/2005
      • nr. 11/2005
    • 2004
      • nr. 09-10/2004
      • nr. 07-08/2004
      • nr. 06/2004
      • nr. 04-05/2004
    • 2003
      • nr. 02-03/2003
      • nr. 01/2003
  • EDITORIAL
  • APARIȚII EDITORIALE

GeoPolitica

Portal de analize geopolitice, strategice si economice

  • ASOCIATIA “ION CONEA”
    • SCOP
    • DONATIONS. SPONSORSHIPS. ADVERTISING
  • Carti TOP FORM
  • G-FOCUS
  • Comanda GEOPOLITICA!
  • ABONAMENTE
  • G-FOCUS
  • CONTACT
  • GDPR
  • 30/05/2023
You are here: Home / TOPICS / GEOHISTORY / Common History, Common Interests: Geostrategic Role of Turkey in the Opinion of Polish Media and Researchers

Common History, Common Interests: Geostrategic Role of Turkey in the Opinion of Polish Media and Researchers

by https://www.geopolitic.ro/author/

Jakub ŻAK, PhD
Przemysław ŁUKASIK, PhD

Logo_of_the_Turkish_Application_to_the_European_UnionToday, Polish political support for Turkey’s EU membership is the result of the heritage of historical relationships and is visible in the interest of Polish media in Turkey1. The main issues, as it is emphasized, that bring the interests of Turkey and Poland are the issues of energy, security and the issue of the South Caucasus2. The theme undertaken in Polish media and in the analysis of research centers is also the issue of political pluralism, the situation of ethnic minorities, respect for human rights in Turkey as important factors affecting the EU accession process.

În prezent, sprijinul politic polonez pentru calitatea de membru UE a Turciei este rezultatul unei moşteniri de relaţii istorice şi este vizibil în interesul mediei poloneze faţă de Turcia. Principalele probleme, cum este evidenţiat, legate de interesele Turciei şi Poloniei sunt problema energiei, securităţii şi problema Caucazului de Sud. Tema prezentă în media poloneză şi analiza centrelor de cercetare este de asemenea problema pluralismului politic, situaţia minorităţilor etnice, respectarea drepturilor omului în Turcia ca factori importanţi ce afectează procesul de aderare la UE.

1 At the start of the Turkey accession process, the Polish press emphasized that “Old Europe is afraid of Turkey, because its 70 million poor people, and in addition 98 percent. professes Islam”and therefore opposed to the extension, or at least wants to close the labor market for Turkish immigrants. Jacek Pawlicki, EU rozpocznie negocjacje członkowskie z Turcją, 16.12.2004, lexisnexis.de, as if in counterpoint raised the argument that the rejection of Turkey would confirm that between Europe and Islam is an impassable chasm. Dawid Warszawski, Turcja do Europy – felieton Dawida Warszawskiego z cyklu „Prognoza Pogody”, 17.02.2004, http://wiadomosci.gazeta.pl/wiadomosci/wyszukaj/artyku l?&query=niezadowoleni+mieszka%F1cy&navauthor=Dawid+Warszawski&sortMode=SCORE&pageNumber=1 [2015-08-27], European military and energy security and a long tradition of good Polish-Turkish relations has been and still are the key arguments present in the political debate and media in Poland, that support the accession of Turkey to the EU. “But it’s worth also remembering that the Ottoman Porta for over a century, the only one in Europe did not recognize partitions and interventions on behalf of Polish independence. (…) from the point of view of European security Turkey’s entry to the EU strengthens it very well, “RS, Turkey in the EU will Polish alliance – says Bronislaw Geremek, 09.06.2004, http://wiadomosci.gazeta.pl/wiadomosci/1,114873,2271871.html,[2015-08-23].

2 Seminar: “Poland and Turkey: common neighborhood – common interests?” was organized by the Polish Institute of International Affairs (PISM) and the Centre for Strategic Studies, acting with the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs on 18 September 2014 in Warsaw. http://www.pism.pl/wydarzenia/konferencje/Polska-i-Turcja-wspolne-interesy-wspolne-sasiedztwo, [2015-08-23].

Related

Filed Under: GEOHISTORY Tagged With: common, Geostrategic, history, interests, Turkey

About

ARTICOL INTEGRAL
Pe geopolitic.ro sunt publicate abstracte ale articolelor publicate în Revista GEOPOLITICA, care poate fi comandată pe www.geopoliticamagazine.com, în format tipărit sau electronic.

Trackbacks

  1. CYBERSECURITY – geopolitics, strategies and risks says:
    06/10/2017 at 12:08

    […] ŻAK, Przemysław ŁUKASIK – Common History, Common Interests: Geostrategic Role of Turkey in the Opinion of Polish Media and Res… […]

Coments Cancel reply

AUTHORS

PARTENERI

Directioneaza 3,5% catre Revista Geopolitica! Descarca de aici formularul!

CHECK MEDIA CU RĂZVAN MUNTEANU. GEOPOLITICA CEREALELOR. ZELENSKI, INVITAT LA SUMMITUL NATO B1 300 K de abonați

CUM ARATĂ ROMÂNIA DUPĂ 19 ANI DE NATO | Vasile Simileanu, la ObiectivEuroAtlantic cu Tudor Curtifan

Carti Geopolitica

International Board

PHOTOSGALLERY

2023


2022



2021



2020



2019



2018



2017



2016



2015




2014



2013



2012



2011



2010



2009



2008



2007



2006



2005



2004



2003


Carti Geopolitica spatiului islamic

Proccedings











Carti GeoStrategie

Carti GeoIntelligence

Carti Fenomenul terorist






Carti GeoEconomie




Arta Militara



Carti Geoistorie

Academica





Comunicare





Carti Drept International

Carti Civilizatie si Cultura





Carti Psihologie


Carti Sociologie



KEYWORD

Asia Centrală (26) Azerbaijan (27) Black Sea (43) carte (37) China (71) conflict (36) cooperare (29) criza (30) energie (28) energy (27) EU (44) Europa (35) European Union (40) geopolitica (157) geopolitics (54) globalizare (55) identitate (26) integrare (28) internationala (32) Irak (47) Iran (62) Islam (41) lansare (44) marea neagra (94) NATO (96) Orientul Mijlociu (29) putere (26) religie (26) Romania (184) Rusia (123) Russia (78) securitate (85) security (48) strategy (26) SUA (77) terorism (56) terrorism (34) Turcia (67) Turkey (38) Ucraina (57) UE (98) Ukraine (48) Uniunea Europeană (54) USA (30) şcoală (33)

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Google+
GeoPolitica Copyright © 2015 - Log in