• HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • CURRENT
  • COMMITTEES
    • NATIONAL BOARD
    • SCIENTIFIC BOARD – INTERNATIONAL
  • ARCHIVE GEOPOLITICA
    • 2026
      • Nr. 1 (110)/2026: ARHITECTURA GEOSTRATEGICĂ – tendințe globale (II)
    • 2025
      • nr.109 (4/2026): ARHITECTURA GEOSTRATEGICĂ – tendințe regionale (I)
      • nr.108 (3/2025): GEOPOLITICĂ ŞI RESURSE
      • Nr. 107 (2/2025): GEOSTRATEGIE ŞI INFRASTRUCTURI CRITICE
      • Nr. 1(106/2025): PRINCIPIUL DOMINOULUI – II –
    • 2024
      • Nr. 4 (105/2024): PRINCIPIUL DOMINOULUI – I –
      • Nr. 3 (104)/2024 Tectonica geopolitică a Mării Negre
      • Nr. 2 (103/2024) Marea Neagră – geopolitică și strategie
      • Nr. 1 (102)/2024 Translații geopolitice (II)
    • 2023
      • nr. 4 (101) Translatii geopolitice (I)
      • NR. 3 (100)/2023 20 DE ANI DE GEOPOLITICĂ ROMÂNEASCĂ
      • NR. 2 (99)/2023 PRESIUNI GEOPOLITICE (II)
      • NR. 1 (98)/2023 PRESIUNI GEOPOLITICE (I)
    • 2022
      • nr. 4 (96-97/2022): Centre de putere. Axe şi falii geopolitice
      • MAREA NEAGRĂ ÎN VORTEXUL GEOPOLITIC (II)
      • MAREA NEAGRĂ ÎN VORTEXUL GEOPOLITIC (I)
      • nr. 1 (92-93/202: Infrastructuri critice emergente II. – Riscuri geopolitice
    • 2021
      • nr. 4 (91/2021): Infrastructuri critice emergente I. – Geopolitică şi rezilienţă
      • nr. 3 (89-90/2021): Inteligenţa Artificială: a cincea dimensiune a geopoliticii
      • nr. 87-88/2021
      • nr. 1 (86/2021): Geopolitică şi (in)securitate (I) – Pandemie şi securitate
    • 2020
      • nr. 4 (85/2020): Amurgul democraţiei? Punct …şi de la capăt (II)
      • nr. 3 (84/2020): 2020: Lumea în schimbare. Punct …şi de la capăt (I)
      • nr. 2 (83/2020): Orientul Mijlociu Extins – între revoltă şi haos constructiv (II)
      • nr. 1 (82/2020): Orientul Mijlociu Extins – între revoltă şi haos constructiv (I)
    • 2019
      • nr. 4 (81/2019): Trianon: 1920-2020
      • nr. 3 (80/2019): Pakistan: a Rising Global Player
      • nr. 2 (78-79/2019): Marea Neagră – Strategii 2020
      • nr. 1 (77/2019): România2019.eu
    • 2018
      • nr. 4 (76/2018): România 1918-2018
      • nr. 3 (75/2018): Orientul Îndepărtat …de la Doctrina Monroe la America First
      • nr. 2 (74/2018): De la Conflictele îngheţate… la Războiul hibrid (II)
      • nr. 1 (73/2018): De la Conflictele îngheţate… la Războiul hibrid (I)
    • 2017
      • nr. 4 (72/2017): Africa „fluidă”
      • nr. 3 (71/2017): Orientul Mijlociu – diplomaţie, geopolitică, securitate
      • nr. 1 (70/2017): Proiecţii geopolitice pe Falia Eurasiatică
      • nr. 1 (68-69/2017): Caucaz – reconciliere şi reconstrucţie
    • 2016
      • nr. 4 (67/2016): Muntenegru – geopolitică şi securitate
      • nr. 3 (66/2016): Resetarea Uniunii Europene
      • nr. 2 (64-65/2016): Provocări geostrategice în estul Europei
      • nr. 1 (63/2016): MENA – între terorism şi securitate
    • 2015
      • nr. 4 (62/2015): Target: Europe!
      • nr. 3 (61/2015): Securitatea cibernetică: geopolitică, riscuri, strategii
      • nr. 2 (60/2015): Faţetele Democraţiei
      • nr. 1 (59/2015 EN): The rise of Saudi Arabia – from regional to international
      • nr. 1 (59/2015 RO): Ascensiunea Arabiei Saudite – de la regional la internaţional
    • 2014
      • nr. 4 (58/2014): GeoIntelligence: geopolitica informaţiilor
      • nr. 3 (57/2014): Gambitul Reginei: geopolitică la Marea Neagră
      • nr. 2 (56/2014: Noul Drum al Mătăsii – provocări şi certitudini
      • nr. 1 (54-55/2014): Lumea în mişcare (Redesenând harta lumii…?!)
    • 2013
      • nr. 4 (53/2013): Cyber Security – Informaţia este o armă!
      • nr. 3 (52/2013): Washington – Beijing – Moscova: Triunghiul geopolitic al viitorului
      • nr. 2 (51/2013): Strategii nucleare şi de securitate
      • nr. 4 (48/2012): Turcia – Diplomaţie şi putere
      • nr. 1 (49-50/2013): Europa la răscruce. De la Statul Naţional la federalizare
    • 2012
      • nr. 3 (47/2012): Irak – strategii energetice şi de securitate
      • nr. 2 (46/2012): Regiunea Golfului – o perspectivă geopolitică
      • nr. 1 (44-45/2012): Noua (dez)ordine mondială
    • 2011
      • nr. 4 (43/2011): Criza unui sistem? – de la „Primăvara Arabă” la „Occupy Wall Street”
      • nr. 3 (41-42/2011): Axa Ponto-Baltică
      • NR. 2 (40/2011): Azerbaidjan – actor geopolitic regional
      • nr. 1 (39/2011): Axa ponto-danubiană – axă strategică
    • 2010
      • nr. 4 (38/2010): Ucraina, între Est şi Vest
      • nr. 3 (36-37/2010): Geopolitica SUA
      • nr. 2 (35/2010): Africa necunoscuta
      • nr. 1 (33-34/2010): Orientul Mijlociu Extins
    • 2009
      • nr. 4 (32/2009): Axa Ponto-Caspică
      • nr. 3 (31/2009): România între Imperii
      • nr. 2 (30/2009): Marea Mediterană
      • nr. 1(29/2009): Criza mondială
    • 2008
      • nr. 4 (28/2008): Conflicte îngheţate în spaţiul Euro-Asiatic
      • nr. 3 (27/2008): Infrastructuri critice – Strategii Euro-Atlantice
      • nr. 2 (26/2008): Globalizarea relaţiilor intercivilizaţionale
      • nr. 1 (25/2008): Turcia: punte eurasiatică
    • 2007
      • nr. 4 (24/2007): Noua geopolitică a Rusiei
      • nr. 3 (23/2007): Asimetria resurselor energetice
      • nr. 2 (22/2007): The Iran Geopolitical Perspectives
      • nr. 1 (21/2007): Provocarea dragonilor – miracolul chinez
    • 2006
      • nr. 4 (20/2006): Regiuni de cooperare transfrontalieră – surse de conflict sau de stabilitate?
      • nr. 3 (19/2006): Falii şi axe geopolitice
      • nr. 2 (18/2006): România – Terra Daciae
      • nr. 1 (16-17/2006): Spaţiul ex-sovietic – provocări şi incertitudini
    • 2005
      • nr. 4 (14-15/2005): Marea Neagră – confluenţe geopolitice
      • nr. 3 (13/2005): Uniunea Europeană…, încotro?
      • nr. 2 (12/2005): Terorism şi mass-media
      • nr. 1 (11/2005): Tensiuni geopolitice induse de ţinuturile istorice
    • 2004
      • nr. 4 (9-10/2004: Incursiune în Islam
      • nr. 3 (7-8/2004): Geopolitica conflictelor sfârşitului de mileniu
      • nr. 2 (6/2004): Geopolitica spaţiului ponto-danubian
      • nr. 1 (04-05/2004): Geopolitica minorităţilor
    • 2003
      • nr. 2 (2-03/2003): Integrare Euro-Atlantică
      • nr. 1 (1/2003): Integrarea României în NATO
  • POLICIES
  • INSTRUCTIONS
  • ABONAMENTE
  • CONTACT
  • GDPR

GeoPolitica

Portal de analize geopolitice, strategice si economice

  • ION CONEA GEOPOLITICAL ASSOCIATION
  • GEOPOLITICS PROJECT
    • INTERNATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL
      • Şcoala de Vară Geopolitica
      • Scoala Internationala de Vara GeoPolititica, ed a VII-a, p. II-a – 2014
      • 2. Scoala Internationala de Vara, editia V, 2014
      • Scoala Internationala de Vara GeoPolitica ed. a VII-a, Ploiesti 2
      • 1. Scoala Internationala de Vara “GeoPolitica”, editia V, 2014
      • 3. Scoala Internationala de Vara GeoPolitica, editia V, 2014
      • 4. Scoala Internationala de Vara “GeoPolitica”, editia V, 2014
      • 5. Scoala Internationala de Vara GeoPolitica, editia V, 2014
      • 6. Scoala Internationala de Vara GeoPolitica, ed. a V-a, 2014
      • 7. Scoala Internationala de Vara, ed aV-a, 2014
      • 8. Scoala Internationala de Vara GeoPolitica, ed a V-a, 2014
      • 9. Scoala Internationala de Vara GeoPolitica, ed a V-a, 2014
      • 10. Scoala Internationala de Vara GeoPolitica, ed a V-a, 2014
      • 11. Scoala Internationala de Vara GeoPolitica, ed a V-a, 2014
      • 12. Scoala Internationala de Vara GeoPolitica, ed aV-a, 2014
      • 13. Scoala Internationala de Vara GeoPolitica, ed a V-a, 2014
    • G-FOCUS
    • GEOPOLITICS CLUB
      • Club Geopolitica
      • Geopolitica Club România
      • Geopolitica Club Cafe
  • EDITURA TOP FORM
  • DONATIONS. SPONSORSHIPS. ADVERTISING
  • 18/04/2026
You are here: Home / TOPICS / GEOPOLITICS / Security Synergies in a Complex World. The Pursuit of the Excellence in both Military and Collective Defence at the Black Sea

Security Synergies in a Complex World. The Pursuit of the Excellence in both Military and Collective Defence at the Black Sea

by https://www.geopolitic.ro/author/

Sorin DOBÎRCIANU

Geopolitica Magazine offers a perspective on strategies and tools designed to embed security consciousness within executives, organisations and communities.

In today’s rapidly evolving geopolitics landscape, cultivating a robust culture of security awareness is more critical than ever. 

That is why Geopolitica is designed to highlight the paramount importance of security awareness, internationally, in the digital age and to equip interested entities, to including governments with actionable strategies to foster a security-centric mindset in various settings.

A brief presentation on the pervasive nature of energy technologies underscoring the increasing integration of these technologies into daily life and the associated rise in Military and Defence vulnerabilities.

By unravelling misconceptions, the interested laboratories will be grouped to identify and evaluate prevalent misconceptions about collective Defence at the Black Sea macro-emergent and extended zone up to the Caspian Sea region. This evaluation seeks to spotlight the knowledge gaps and challenges in the general perception of Global Security, affected by the conflict in Ukraine.

An important hint consists in Demystifying Security with Real-world Scenarios by presenting real-world case studies, emphasising the tangible consequences of accurate threats and the importance of being proactive rather than reactive.

Moreover, the Strategies for Enhancing Awareness will contribute and collaboratively brainstorm on effective new and revised methods to promote the necessary awareness. This includes considering new integrated and collective exercises, awareness campaigns, and leveraging influential platforms for outreach. Through role-play, interested governments will engage in simulated scenarios, allowing them to understand the practical implications of awareness and the roles different stakeholders play in incident response.

A Defence Forward Path will wrap up by reiterating the collective role in fostering a suitable security-aware culture, highlighting the motivations to align to the new insights, and acting as catalysts for change in their respective environments.

In this way, the new defence culture at the Black Sea should be tailored to the European context, facilitating the hands-on development of cooperative security strategies that resonate with European values, regulations, compliance and threats.

Amidst the complex tapestry of global Security, the European landscape presents its unique challenges and opportunities, at the Black Sea, on the future Energy and Defence endeavours, for immersing the active players in the intricacies of European and Trans-Atlantic security, empowering them to collaboratively design frameworks and strategies that are attuned to the region’s specific needs, challenges, and aspirations, due the new energy macro planning: Baku-Tbilisy-Ceyhan, new roles of Baku, Aktau, Poti hubs, structuring the New European Context Setting and providing with a seria of new scenarios regarding the European security landscape, touching upon potential threats, key regulations like GDPR, landmark incidents, and regional collaboration initiatives like ENISA. These scenario-based approaches will create a vivid backdrop, helping governments understand the unique dynamics and urgencies of the Next European context, by Identifying European Challenges based on the provided scenario : the specific challenges Europe faces in security collaboration, from regulatory harmonisation to cross-border threat intelligence sharing.

The New European-centric Solutions & Best Practices Concept:

Building on the previously identified challenges, interested European and NATO actors will brainstorm solutions and best practices tailored to the European context, considering factors like EU policies, regional geopolitics, and shared Ukrainian conflict infrastructure.

Sketching the European Framework by drawing from the brainstorming insights, each interested actor in the Black Sea Future Energy Region will outline a European collaborative security strategy. Influencers and Facilitators, well-versed in European and Trans-Atlantic security nuances, will provide feedback and ensuring alignment with European standards and values.

The New European Way Forward will wrap up with reflections on the importance of a unified European approach to security, encouraging interested governments, organizations, agencies and competent labs to champion and iterate upon the specific ops in their respective EU-based entities.

Innovative future dialogues exploring present-day security challenges to forecast emerging threats. As we stand at the crossroads of major interests world-wide, One Belt One Road Initiative ( BRI ) | the New Silk Road and its implications due Nabucco, AGRI, PEOP Constanta-Trieste, South Stream, North Stream frozen strategies / multidisciplinary energy strategies etc it is the paramount conclusion to examine today’s concerns to ensure a safer and more secure security realm for tomorrow’s Black Sea. 

The security realm in between the Black Sea – the Caspian Sea Region is continuously evolving, and with it arises a new set of challenges. These concerns, while daunting, are not insurmountable, especially when tackled collectively Military and Defence New Strategies with the right set of knowledge, expertise, and foresight. Our evaluation today is not just about identifying these challenges but also about charting a roadmap to address them proactively.

Due the including Geopolitica Magazine in the top chart specific global analysis world-wide as one of the leading providers ( TOP TEN ) of dedicated and specialized global geopolitics & strategic analysis-solutions Overseas for the specific sectors, globally: geopolitics, security, defence, military, economics, intel, its mission is to enhance the new resilience of the above-mentioned sectors through innovative research, expert advice, training, and education, providing a wide range of special approaches to public and private organisations in the “field”, including vulnerability assessments, penetration testing conclusions, incident response, and compliance assessments.

Geopolitica experts bring together extensive experience and knowledge of the revealed areas best practices, forecasting crucial initiatives for the Black Sea’s emergent region future, under a motivational, inspirational, and educational special dedicated and specific proactive-path.

These are some of the matters of great importance in the mentioned fields as well as questions to be asked and answered:

Over the years, Romania and the countries bordered at the sea have collaborated in various fields, from energy and trade to education and culture. These relations are a testament to the enduring friendship and partnership between the countries.

The Black Sea Security Space, is a premier gathering hub of the brightest minds club & cluster in the domain of Security next to the Ukrainian Military Conflict, involving a melting pot of experts, armies, alliances, policymakers, industry leaders, academics, Intel, Defence, Military and Security [ for Cyber, Aviation and Maritime ] senior lead experts, to including Overseas enthusiasts, exploring the intertwining realm of Security, drawing inspiration from ever-changing events and developments in the commitment world. In a world dominated by digital integration, the 2024 theme, “Security Synergies in a Digitalised World,” underscores the critical need to create and nurture synergies in the security matrix at the Black Sea, and understanding these synergies becomes paramount. No longer can sectors of security operate in silos; the challenges faced are universal, transcending borders and sectors.

This necessitates a collaborative approach where knowledge, tools, and strategies are shared, merged, and optimised. Synergies ensure that there is a seamless flow of information, rapid response mechanisms, and a cohesive strategy in place.

A synergised approach customised for the Black Sea’s future ensures that responses to threats are unified and coordinated among the public and private sectors, defence and civilian spheres, various industries, academia, and the whole society.

Europe can and is willing to do more on its own benefit. But if the continent aims to do more, the EU first needs to explain why.

  • Facilitate the sharing of best practices, recent developments, and challenges in Security.

  • Drive a harmonised European approach to security sectors in Europe, respecting shared and unique national concerns.

  • Emphasise an integrated European strategy focusing on resilience across the defence infrastructure.

  • Showcase security solutions to bolster Europe’s defence against different threats in the Black Sea.

  • Broaden the network of Defence and Security professionals across Europe, fostering unity and shared purpose.

  • Gather feedback on presented initiatives and strategies, refining future collective activities under the NATO’s Umbrella.

There are a few broad categories: the need to provide stability in our neighbourhood and across different regions. We are connected to the world by narrow straits, stormy seas and vast land borders. Because of that geography, Europe knows better than anyone that if you don’t deal in time with the crisis abroad, the crisis comes to you. Secondly, the nature of the threats we face is evolving rapidly: from hybrid or asymmetric attacks to the growing arms race in the ground war theatre and space.

One of the primary advantages of fostering such energies is the pooling of resources and expertise. Therefore, the primary objective of Europe as well as the Alliance in Eastern Europe bordering the Black Sea should be to foster collaboration, disseminate pioneering research, and bolster readiness for the looming challenges of a New Black Sea Roles Path, and underscoring the interdependence, shared challenges and mutual benefits of collaborative efforts in the new Alliance strategy at the Black Sea Region.

Therefore, in our asymmetric War era, the New Black Sea Future is paramount and serves as a beacon, guiding the collective wisdom, and bringing together the strategy.

Also seeks to pave the way for a synergic security world order, integrating the EU and NATO overarching goals in the security realm globally.

With such initiatives, the Alliance could reiterate its unwavering commitment to a unified, resilient and security Black Sea Future, bridging the Gap – Civilian and Defence Security EU Synergies.

This post sets out to dissect civilian and defence security convergence, spotlighting the synergies between these two traditionally distinct realms and the paramount importance of their harmonized collaboration.

In the intricate tapestry of global Security, to including the Black Sea and Ukraine, the convergence of civilian and defence sectors has emerged as a focal point of special labs evaluation, emphasising the intertwined nature of their challenges and solutions.

The civilian and defence sectors, while operating with different primary objectives, find themselves facing many shared threats in the digital domain. From critical infrastructure attacks that cripple a nation’s utilities to sophisticated espionage campaigns targeting corporate secrets and state intelligence, the lines between ‘civilian’ and ‘defence’ cyber threats have become increasingly blurred.

The post delves into how this convergence is reshaping the cybersecurity landscape. It will highlight cases where collaboration between these sectors has led to identifying, mitigating, and preventing significant cyber threats. Such collective partnerships not only leverage the technical expertise of the private sector but also benefit from the defence sector’s intelligence capabilities and strategic perspectives.

Furthermore, will probe into the European implications of these synergies. How can EU member states collectively benefit from a harmonised civilian and defence security approach? How might international collaborations pave the way for a more secure global security ecosystem again?

This post promises a comprehensive exploration of the synergistic relationship between civilian and defence & security sectors.

We are intensively preparing for the Alliance New Endeavours, strengthening the allied defensive capacity on the Eastern Flank and in the Black Sea region, especially, evolving at an exponential pace and we are witnessing transformative changes Overseas.

The Update Concept: The Marine Landscape – Opportunities and Threats

This post also seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of the current digital geopolitical environment, diving into the nuances of contemporary challenges and the potential avenues for innovation, collaboration, and growth.

Disclaimer: Geopolitica Magazine Romania stands with the strategic partners and allies values, the rest of having the walls closing in on them, expressing the floodgates of truth and nothing can stop the truth from finally being reported. This content is in part for educational purposes, denouncing any form of conflict, war, violence, hate, or harassment. Furthermore, this article does not endorse or promote dangerous acts, organizations, or any forms of violence. In accordance with the 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, this content is made available for “fair use” purposes, including criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, research, and advisory.

Photo credit: Thanks, the British experts and colleagues, for being fast and great photographers! [ HMS IRON DUKE ]

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Filed Under: GEOPOLITICS

About

ARTICOL INTEGRAL
Pe geopolitic.ro sunt publicate abstracte ale articolelor publicate în Revista GEOPOLITICA, care poate fi comandată pe www.geopoliticamagazine.com, în format tipărit sau electronic.

COLEGIUL DE REDACŢIE

DIRECTOR FONDATOR: Vasile SIMILEANU
Senior Editor: Vasile SIMILEANU
Secretar ştiinţific: Cristian BARNA
Secretar general de redacţie: Iulian IFTIMI
Secretar de redacţie: Monica TODORAN
Coperta şi grafica: Vasile SIMILEANU, Andrei MITUCĂ
Redactor Şef: Cristina GEORGESCU (SIMILEANU)
Redactori: Cosmin PĂCURARU, Adrian POPA, Mihaela RUSU
Webdisigner: Alexandru DINU
Website: Vasile SIMILEANU, Bogdan GHELMEGEANU, Cristian PETRICĂ

REFERENŢI ŞTIINŢIFICI

Constantin ANECHITOAE – Universitatea „Ovidius”, Constanţa
Maricel ANTIPA – Universitatea Naţională de Apărare „Carol I”, Bucureşti
Cristian BARNA – Universitatea Bucureşti
Adrian FILIP – Universitatea „Andrei Şaguna”, Constanţa
Constantin HLIHOR – Universitatea Bucureşti
Aliodor MANOLEA – Universitatea Hyperion, Bucureşti
Ioana RIEBER – Societatea de Ştiinţe Istorice din România
Radu SĂGEATĂ – Institutul de Geografie al Academiei Române

NOTES

Authors are directly responsible for the choice and presentation of data contained in the articles, of their authenticity and originality, as well as their own opinions. The wording and presentation of the text is not always the opinion of the GeoPolitica Magazine and are not binding in any way editorial responsibility.

Reproduction in whole or in part of any written or illustrative material in this publication is prohibited without a written permission from the publisher.

Editors assume no responsibility for the content of material submitted by sponsors.

EDITURA TOP FORM

Editură abilitată de către Consiliul Naţional de Atestare a Titlurilor, Diplomelor şi Certificatelor Universitare (CNATDCU): – Comisia pentru Ştiinţe Militare, Informaţii şi Ordine Publică, Categoria Edituri A2, poz. 16

– Comisia pentru Sociologie, Ştiinţe Politice şi Administrative, Categoria Edituri A2, poz. 17

Editură recunoscută de către Consiliul Naţional al Cercetării Ştiinţifice din Învăţământul Superior – cod CNCSIS 325

Comenzi şi abonamente la:

Tel: 0314 298 400; 0722 207 617; 0722 704 176

www.geopolitic.ro; www.edituratopform.com; www.geopoliticamagazine.com
editura.topform@yahoo.com; editura.topform@gmail.com; geopolitica.magazine@yahoo.com

Referenti stiintifici

Constantin ANECHITOAE – Universitatea „Ovidius”, Constanţa Maricel ANTIPA – Universitatea Naţională de Apărare „Carol I”, Bucureşti Cristian BARNA – Universitatea Bucureşti Adrian FILIP – Universitatea „Andrei Şaguna”, Constanţa Constantin HLIHOR – Universitatea Bucureşti Aliodor MANOLEA – Universitatea Hyperion, Bucureşti Ioana RIEBER – Societatea de Ştiinţe Istorice din România Radu SĂGEATĂ – Institutul de Geografie al Academiei Române

Geopolitica Magazine from Romanie in Top 15 Geopolitics Magazines in 2026, FeedSpot

The best Geopolitics magazines from thousands of magazines on the web ranked by traffic, social media followers & freshness.

Lear more….

Indexare Index COPERNICUS

Revista Geopolitica

Indexare MEDIOQ

Revista Geopolitica

ISSN: 3044-8484 ISSN-L: 1583-543X

AUTHORS

REFERENŢI ŞTIINŢIFICI

Constantin ANECHITOAE – Universitatea „Ovidius”, Constanţa Maricel ANTIPA – Universitatea Naţională de Apărare „Carol I”, Bucureşti Cristian BARNA – Universitatea Bucureşti Adrian FILIP – Universitatea „Andrei Şaguna”, Constanţa Constantin HLIHOR – Universitatea Bucureşti Aliodor MANOLEA – Universitatea Hyperion, Bucureşti Ioana RIEBER – Societatea de Ştiinţe Istorice din România Radu SĂGEATĂ – Institutul de Geografie al Academiei Romane

Pentru comenzi, click pe imagine!

PARTENERI

International Board

PHOTOSGALLERY

Carti Geopolitica

2023



2022



2021



2020



2019



2018



2017



2016



2015




2014



2013



2012



2011



2010



2009



2008



2007



2006



2005



2004



2003


Carti Geopolitica spatiului islamic

Proccedings